FLAMING WATERDROPS

We often imagine that action is the true beginning. The strike, the step, the decision, the movement. But action is only the surface. The real beginning happens earlier—quietly, invisibly—when we finally see what is in front of us without distortion. Observation is recognition. Not guessing, not interpreting, not hoping. Just letting reality stand as it is. When we observe clearly, the situation reveals its patterns, its direction, its weight. Nothing needs to be forced. Nothing needs to be invented. We simply meet what is already there. Most people look, but they do not see. They stare through a wall of emotions, memories, fears, and expectations. So their reactions are never truly about the moment—they are about their own inner noise. But when the noise falls to the background, even for a second, the world becomes sharp. Precise. Unfiltered. This is the first movement of Percomboo: the silent shift where perception becomes clean. Once this happens, action becomes eff...

Copy First, Create Later: How People Learn and Solve Problems In today's world, there are people with inner motivation — they know what they want and are willing to try the ideas that come to mind. These are the experimenters , the inventors . Then there are others who need to be motivated externally — by other people, by incentives. This second type is more common and reflects the spontaneous reaction most people have when first facing a problem. When a problem arises, the first instinct is to look for examples. If there's something to copy, they copy it — like a son mimics his father's way. Only if there is no example does the inventive process begin. So we can conclude: there's no problem with duplication , even though InFi development advocates creation rather than copying . The truth is that creation works in both ways : First, we copy. Second, we invent. This also explains the popularity of corporate styles in the past. To summarize: I WANT TO DO SO...

(karate) InFi by Tanaka Have you ever noticed that many karate practitioners' styles look completely different in a real fight compared to traditional karate? Have you ever observed that during spontaneous free fighting, it's nearly impossible to guess a competitor's traditional style—unless it's already known? Isn't it interesting how the structured, classical styles often seem to evaporate in real combat? The reason is simple: unpredictable situations are the domain of InFi . No external system has dominance over the power of InFi in that space. My friend John once said that the body reacts naturally using movements and techniques that have been instilled over time. That’s true. It’s the result of learning—repetition creates automatic reactions. But does that directly connect with the personal style I’m talking about? Yes, but only partially. Part of an individual's style is learned—copied or invented—and the other part is inborn. I would say the base of a...

DO YOU HAVE A FIGHTING STYLE? WHERE IS IT FROM? What would your style be if you grew up in a forest, constantly under attack, forced to defend yourself without anyone to follow or learn from? Your style would be your own—an invented, individual fighting style.